House Segregation and Gentrification in Chicago

By Luke McFarlane and Jhanvi Verma

Photo/ Jhanvi Verma

“The problem is in the continuous ‘solutions’ to segregation, like gentrification, that only perpetuates the issue instead of fixing it,” is what 21-year-old Christian Ortega had to say about his hometown of Little Village.

Pilsen and Little Village are Latino neighborhoods situated in the West of Chicago. They are known for their cultural food and art, which are representative of Latino culture.

According to a statistic from Crain’s Chicago Business, Pilsen is one of the areas of Chicago that has seen one of the most drastic drops in the Latino population. Amongst Pilsen was Logan Square and Avondale, two other neighborhoods that are known to be largely populated by Latinos.

“I love how rooted history and culture are within the neighborhood,” Pilsen resident Karina Blanco said.

Ortega agreed, adding that the Latino presence of Pilsen and Little Village in Chicago allows for a place where they can express themselves, and indulge in their culture while feeling like they belong; “These neighborhoods create a sense of community for people.”

Blanco added, “Since I’m Latina, I can communicate with the people well and I am familiar with the customs.” 

But not everything regarding Pilsen’s rich cultural history has been positive.

“The problem is that segregation has created cultural hubs, that many of the residents now rely on in order to find work; and gentrification breaks apart those cultural bonds that the residents share, and makes it harder for the original population of minorities to live adequately.” Ortega expressed. “Chicago is known for being a gumbo of sorts. It’s a mixing pot of a bunch of different cultures, everybody has their own place where they can feel safe and where their culture is celebrated. Gentrification breaks those strongholds, but it’s the product of trying to fix segregation.”

Largely, the result of a high number of Latino’s in Pilsen is due to the ongoing issue of segregation in Chicago.

   

For example, Ortega talks about a place in Pilsen called “The Discount Mall.” This facility was a huge place for market vendors, all of whom were Latino.

“When this place was bought out by a company with a higher income, these vendors who were known and liked by those in this neighborhood were forced to move out, and were replaced by big-name businesses, namely owned by Caucasians,” Ortega explained.

As a direct result of past racism and separation of people based on ethnicities, many minorities in Chicago are now living in underdeveloped neighborhoods where they do not have access to sufficient education which leads to an increase in criminal activities among neighborhoods with low socioeconomic class

Map: Chicago’s Income from North to South

Calling it a “linear city,” Blanco said that the north parts of Chicago consist of higher-income residents, with more luxury apartments; the further you descend into the south and west sides, it becomes more minority driven and social class begins to waver among residents and neighborhoods.

When asked if Chicago should have segregated parts of the city, Blanco said, “I feel in an urban city, it is bound to happen. We have a lot of immigrants in the United States, so being surrounded by people from your culture who share your beliefs and customs as you, it is home. People naturally gravitate towards something familiar to them. It should not strictly be segregated like that, but it tends to be that case. Gentrification is bad when it’s forced.”

The force of gentrification is where people who belong to lower socioeconomic classes like Blanco and Ortega feel the pressure.

“Even if they aren’t trying to be, when the majority comes in and takes over a place that was once a cultural hotspot for minorities, it can feel invasive, and that’s when it’s a problem. Gentrification, a negative thing, is the result of an attempted solution to segregation, another negative thing.” Ortega said.

Dr. John Betancur, a professor in the Urban Planning and Policy department at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said that much of the recurrent segregation issues stem from some practices still in place in the real estate market.

“In the 30’s, housing rules made it so white people could only pass on housing to white people, and not minorities,” Betancur said. “The Fair Housing Act of 1968 banned discrimination in the [housing] market, but real estate businesses continue to practice segregation; sending minorities to neighborhoods that are minority driven, and white people to predominantly white neighborhoods.”

Chicago is known to be associated with large amounts of violence and criminal activities, no matter what the external circumstance, especially in the west and south sides.

According to a report by the Sun-Times, “Amid a statewide stay-at-home order, Chicago saw the most violent five-day span of the year earlier this week, with 60 people shot between Sunday [April 5, 2020] and Thursday [April 9, 2020].” 

When Blanco was asked why that’s the case, she said, “when you build a community without libraries, grocery stores, healthy food options, and access to substantial education. People don’t know any better, they lack accessibility and quality care. I think it’s more of a government issue.” 

The effects of segregation and gentrification have an almost direct correlation with the cause of violence in many of these neighborhoods. According to an article by WGN, it comes back to the 1960s, when the city “poured money” into Downtown Chicago, rather than into minority driven communities. This led to a huge drop in the quality of schools in the south and west sides of the cities. In these understaffed schools, kids never learn to respect authority, which draws parallels to police as they age. These same kids grow up with very few economic opportunities in their areas, leading them to turn to drugs, alcohol, and violence.

GIF: Crimes Reported from 2001-2020 (Data collected from Chicago Data Portal)

When asked about their overall opinions on segregation and gentrification, Christian Ortega’s opinions were mixed.

“The terms imply something bad, but that doesn’t mean that the outcome hasn’t created good things,” he said. “Segregation has created close communities. Gentrification has given places that were once food deserts a plethora of grocery stores and markets.” 

The issue seems to be, however, that gentrification doesn’t solve problems, it merely moves them somewhere else. For example, a study at the University of Chicago suggests that the food deserts don’t disappear, they just relocate, creating a new area of lower-income, while the original home of those people is overcome with people who can afford the new amenities.

“Those people who can’t keep up with the price of living going up are forced out of their cultural community and have to find another low-income space to live, ” says Ortega. 

“When the standard of living suddenly increases, prices of services, foods, and other things can skyrocket. Then you have an unprepared population of minorities mixing with the new people who have come in, who are able to afford those things, and there’s this huge imbalance that can’t really coexist together, at an economic level.”

Flickr/Stephanie Barto

Something equally as significant as education to minorities is education to the majority. Why should white Americans learn about gentrification?

“It’s important to preserve the culture,” Ortega said. “It’s one thing to come somewhere because it’s cheaper; but there should be a certain level of respect because it can be invasive, even if you don’t know it is. Things can be taken away from peoples’ culture simply by majorities coming in and taking over. Especially by the ratio of majorities and minorities changing.”

But what about the future? The past has created the circumstances that Chicagoans live in today, so what will today do to the future?

Dr. Betancur continued and said, “If I am allowed to dream, I would say that one day converts, as in religion, and decides not to sin anymore; which means that they erase sentiments they have with being neighbors with other races.”

We would need to reverse a hundred years of history in some sort of miracle to fix the current issue of segregation and gentrification.

GOOGLE TRENDS: The Rise of K-Pop in the USA and how Chicago Weather impacts the Homeless

According to an analysis of Google search data, BTS; Korea’s most popular band has surpassed Justin Bieber within the last 5 years, even in the United States. An exception to this would be a spike in Bieber’s popularity in July of 2018, around the time when he proposed to girlfriend Hailey Baldwin. The first time BTS met Bieber’s popularity in searches was in May 2017, and then finally surpassed the American singer-songwriter in November in that same year, and since the beginning of July 2018, BTS has maintained a steady lead over Justin Bieber.

What does this say about pop culture in USA, and how the focus has changed over the past half-decade? Have people become less interested in American culture, and more interested in foreign culture? What has become so intriguing about a language that most Americans can’t understand?

K-pop “idols” or stars, are trained from a young age, and even attend “K-pop schools” where they learn how to play the part of a celebrity, all while rigorously training in singing, dancing, etc. They become so global because of the positivity they radiate, and the obsessional component and fetishization the audience places on them. The rise of Korean music in the United States isn’t always a product of good intention, whether the fans are aware of their motives or not. In fact, K-pop super-fans in America are notoriously known for obsessing purely on the idols looks themselves, before their music.

What does this increase in popularity overtime say about the American publics’ interests over time?

According to an another analysis of Google Trends search data, “Chicago homeless shelter” increases in search quantity during the colder months of the year, especially in the last 12 months. In fact, the search had the most dramatic increase toward the end of January, 2019. This is around the time that Chicago experienced “Polar Vortex,” reaching temperatures low enough to reach 21 degrees Fahrenheit below 0.

This shows that, at these times, people; whether homeless or not, are more inclined to search for homeless shelters in Chicago. If these homeless shelters provide food, and emergency shelter, why would this be the only time, and what does this say about the motives behind staying out of homeless shelters? This also raises the question of if homeless shelters in Chicago are doing enough for the homeless community to allow them to have the necessities they need, and why they would be so prone to be uninterested in months where weather isn’t severe.

QUINN: Pensions Threaten MAP Grant Program

Gov. Pat Quinn talks about MAP grants at DePaul University. (Photo/Bob Smith)

Editors Note: This story was originally posted on December 12, 2012 and is housed at RedLineProject.com

By Bob Smith

Gov. Pat Quinn visited DePaul University’s Loop campus on Wednesday to discuss how pension reform is harming the Monetary Award Program (MAP) college scholarships and access to higher education in Illinois.

“This is so important to our state, not only in the past, but certainly now and in the future,” Quinn said.

“We want everyone to have the opportunity to go to college that has the ability to go to college.”

MAP grants are need-based college scholarships that allow merit students who are in need across the state and do not need to be repaid by the student. Quinn said that due to cutbacks and having to pay more money in the pension amount, almost 18,000 students lost their MAP grant scholarships this year.

“We do not want anyone denied that opportunity because of finances,” Quinn said. “We can’t afford to lose all the talent that exists, all the ability that exists for higher education to help our economy and to help all of us, because there are financial challenges that deny someone the opportunity to go to community college or a four-year university — public and private — in our state.”

Quinn was joined by several Illinois college students, including DePaul Student Government Association Vice President Casey Clemmons.

“Every year over 5,000 DePaul students receive MAP grants, and just like the students who have already spoken here today, all of these DePaul students rely on this funding in order to continue their college careers,” Clemmons said.

“Because the number of Illinois students eligible to receive MAP is currently increasing, existing funding does not allow the state to assist all the eligible students. As a result, without action by the Illinois state leadership, more DePaul students than ever will see their MAP funding disappear this year and more

DePaul students than ever will be forced to give up their education due to finances.”

More than 150,000 students nationally receive MAP grants each year.

Clemmons told the audience that on Tuesday, DePaul’s SGA unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Illinois general assembly and the governor to ensure the longevity of the MAP program.  He read the resolution aloud and presented a copy to Quinn. 

Ken Thomas, a University of Illinois Board of Trustees student member, MAP recipient and University of Illinois Chicago student, told how he wouldn’t be where he is today if it wasn’t for the MAP grant.

“My mom, when I was in high school, had to work two jobs just to keep food on the table,” Thomas said, “and if we didn’t have [the] MAP program like we do today, I know that I wouldn’t be where I am today; graduating with a degree, hoping to be a productive member of society.” 

Having a productive and functioning society and economy is what Quinn says it’s all about.

“Jobs follow brainpower,” he said. “We want to make sure we have smart people in Illinois. Well skilled, well-educated students coming out of college with graduate degrees and diplomas so they can create jobs, create new businesses,” he said. “Our goal in Illinois is to have at least 60 percent of the adults in our state with a college degree or college associate degree or career certificate by the year 2025. In order to achieve we have to make sure we have a good scholarship program.”

Clemmons said that in order for that to happen, state legislatures need to reflect upon the question, “What must be done?” and do what’s required.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started